Know Your Rights

http://knowledgeispower-uk.weebly.com/uk-police-force.html

Each individual ‘Police Force’ is a commercial company, it has NO AUTHORITY to enforce anything, any more than a McDonalds or a BurgerKing has. The men & women that work under the banner of their local ‘Police Force’ have two separate roles. When they take up their occupation, they take an ‘oath of office’ pledging to uphold the ‘Common Law’. That oath, and nothing else gives them the Authority to act to enforce ‘Common Law’ – that is, the few things which are listed in our ‘Legalese – Acts & Statutes’ page above.

‘Common Law’ DOES NOT authorise them to do anything connected with so-called ‘Government’ Statutes & Acts and so they have been trained to use ‘Legalese’ to entrap UN-INFORMED members of the Public! To be fair, it is highly likely that even the members or the Police Force are aware of what they are doing and do not understand the difference between ‘Legal Statutes’ (which are optional) and the ‘Lawful’ Common Law requirements which apply to EVERYONE and are NOT optional.

PLEASE DONT GET US WRONG – A lot of Policemen and Policewomen do a great job and assist members of the Public, sometimes above and beyond the requirements of there job – opposing bullying, intimidation, fraud etc. and comforting in cases of bereavement or injury. BUT, the commercial companies who control the Police Force are working extremely hard to end this sort of positive behavior, using ridiculous Health & Safety regulations as an excuse, even to the extent that Police Officers are instructed for example to stand by and watch somebody drown and not attempt to save them! This is not the choice of the ‘Officer’ but the instructions of the owners of the company.

SO, because these thousands & thousands of ‘invented’ offenses dont apply to ANYBODY unless they agree to be bound via ‘consent’ it becomes essential for a ‘Police Officer’ to (possibly with out knowing) persuade a member of the Public to agree to subject him/herself to these unnecessary restrictions and agree to pay invented cash penalties to the local commercial company called the ‘Police Force’ or ‘Constabulary’. The normal first attempt to establish this spurious dominance of the ‘Police Officer’ is by him asking for your name. This is NOT an INNOCENT question and it is essential that you are VERY CAREFUL in what you say as there are verbal ‘Legalese’ TRAPS all over the place!

One suitable reply is “The Law does not require me to provide that information” which is entirely correct and avoids the first major pitfall, and no matter how often the question is asked, the answer always remains the SAME. It is also vitally IMPORTANT not to argue with a Police Officer as that is another ‘Legalese’ TRAP which makes you subject to the thousands of hateful regulations solely designed to part you of your MONEY. So, only answer questions (ideally with a non aggressive question) and dont volunteer ANY INFORMATION AT ALL.

So, here are some examples to help you understand;

If a Police Officer says “you were exceeding the speed limit!” you could say “Was I?” as you DONT ARGUE, nor do you point out that ‘Common Law’ does not require anybody to keep to the speed limits, obey road signs, park only where directed ETC. even though that is perfectly TRUE!

Under ‘Common Law’ an offense has only been committed IF there is a VICTIM (somebody who has been killed or injured, had possessions damaged or stolen or who has been defrauded) SO, if the Police Officer keeps pushing you to agree to pay his company money when you DONT need to, then a good question to ask is “Who is the Victim?” or alternatively some thing like “What is the charge? or am I free to go?” if you stick to these things, then the Police Officer has nothing to work on as you have not agreed to be bound by ‘Statutes’ as you have not provided a NAME and ADDRESS for him to write on an invoice/bill or ‘Fixed Penalty Notice’ as they like to call it! and you have not entered into a ‘controversy’ by arguing with him or her into ‘dishonor’ by refusing them point blank.

“You may also use your phone, perfectly legally as a record of proof to aid BOTH parties, to film the intercourse as pointed out in the Strawman film IF you are in a Public place – why do you think the City of London is mostly now been sold to private commercial interests…?”.

The oath should be similar to:

“English

I, … of … do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable, with fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding fundamental human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I will, to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved and prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to law.

https://www.freelists.org/post/constitution/Police-oath-duties-and-Common-Law-Re-Letter-published-in-paper,2

My understanding of this is:

If an “officer” has not taken this Oath, then it should be questionable as to whether said officer PERSON/ENTITY has more “rights” of enforcement than anyone else. If acting as a Corporate Entity then only Corporate/Financial Law, if relevant, should apply?

So, film the encounter (legal unless on others private property?), ask for the name and badge number ID of the Officer (legally obliged as a public servant to give this info as IT could be a fraud also), what the charge is, under what capacity and relevant statute, and whether you are being arrested or are free to go, and admit to NOTHING, especially if you have committed no Common Law Crime. As you have a phone, use it to check relevant Statute you are being charged under. You are innocent until PROVEN guilty by a court of your peers, under Common Law.

BUT that does not mean you will be treated as such by local police if they have accessed your personal threat level through available data mining tools such as “Intrado” shown in this video:

https://youtu.be/HDMcmGng4vs

Be aware that admitting to being a PERSON entity may be self incriminating. Also, Anti Terrorist Laws were created to conveniently over rule Common Law when under Martial Law, which both the US and UK still seem to be  “under” due to a never ending war declared on “Terrorism”. Be careful what “entity” you admit to being – it may be labelled a terrorist!

Know the difference between “subject”, “citizen” and “Sovereign Being”

Be A Citizen When You Need To Be

The Ficticious Legal Entity Called “a Person”

getoutofdebtfree.org

If a debt collector does come to your home there are a few things that you should know:

  • They are not a bailiff, a sheriff, or an enforcement agent. If they pretend to be any of these things, they are committing a criminal offence.
  • You don’t have to open the door for them.
  • They are required to show you proof of ID.
  • If you ask them to leave, they have to go immediately.
  • They are not allowed to take anything from your home.

Why do may need to know this? Because it’s all over shortly with an impending social and/or deliberate chaos causing financial crash/world war/more catastrophes through the Elite’s (via Trump’s) N Korea/weather warfare etc. policies, probably rushed in now due to the exponential collapse of Earth’s systems due to Geo Engineering…(I don’t give a shit anymore as I don’t have kids coz I saw it all coming in the 90s – it’s all inevitable anyway sooner or later due to the (mostly) moronic human creature that doesn’t deserve the planet).